Clik here to view.
Von: Mahnny
@uelzer, you quoted the population numbers of 1950. I think, many users note Berlin, Hamburg, Munich as their location whether they only live _near_ these cities. And finally: No statistics is valid...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Von: Stephan Naumann
Schicke Grafiken und logisches Vorgehen! Nur fehlt mir hier der qualitative Aspekt. Hast du alle User zwischen 1.900 und 2.100 Friends wirklich als Bots kategorisiert? Ich kann den Gedankengang...
View ArticleVon: Benedikt Koehler
@Vidar No, I just looked at the location and description fields of the Twitter profiles. Only 1% of the Twitter users that had one of the cities in their location fields have enabled geo-information in...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Von: Der Alte Griesgram
Just for fun. How would the #Pott perform if you add, Bochum, Essen, Duisburg and Dortmund. You may even add Dueseldorf although neither people from Duesseldorf nor from the Pott would like to see been...
View ArticleVon: Dietmar Fischer
… the 2,000 follower barrier: it is because of the many spammers that Twitter inserted a a barrier at 2,000 following. Twitter only allows you to follow 2,000 people. After this you need more people...
View ArticleVon: Dietmar Fischer
… ups, Quelle vergessen: http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/follow-limit-auf-twitter
View ArticleVon: Vidar Andersen
@Benedikt Thanks for the clarification! Interesting insights. That’s a very low number. It would be interesting to see how it compares internationally.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Von: OliverG
Bielefeld is a Joke by veteran usenetters, right? Or did all CCC-Members claim they were in Iran… ehm Bielefeld? Something like this
View ArticleClik here to view.
Von: Klaus Jan
(late comment thx for this nice introduction into big data. But I do’nt think Twitters decision is based on those data – it’s just the popularity of Berlin in the English speaking world. Berlin has a...
View Article
